06 May 2008 Belgrade _ EU and Belgrade officials have criticised Belgium’s Foreign Minister for saying the EU pre-membership deal was signed “with Serbia alone, without Kosovo.”
“My understanding is that we signed the Stabilisation and Association Agreement, SAA, with Serbia alone, without Kosovo,” said Karel De Gucht.
In Belgrade, Serbia’s Minister for Kosovo, Slobodan Samardzic said De Gucht’s words “confirmed what Prime Minister Vojislav Kostunica has been saying all along.”
Samardzic, of Kostunica’s nationalist Democratic Party of Serbia, DSS, said the statement proved that the signing of the SAA in fact meant signing off Kosovo’s independence.
Serbia’s Foreign Minister Vuk Jeremic, however, said De Gucht’s remarks were “for internal political use only.”
Belgium joined Netherlands in opposing Serbia’s signing of the SAA, widely seen as the first step toward EU membership, until Belgrade is deemed to be fully cooperating with the International Criminal Tribunal for Former Yugoslavia, ICTY, based in The Hague.
The two countries eventually gave in and accepted to sign the deal on April 29, although Belgrade will only gain benefits of the deal when there is cooperation with The Hague Tribunal.
“Belgium opposed the SAA with Serbia and De Gucht’s words therefore have an exclusive domestic political purpose,” Jeremic said.
In Brussels, EU foreign policy chief Javier Solana’s spokeswoman Cristina Gallach also criticised De Gucht’s statement, saying that the SAA signed with Serbia “has a neutral stand towards Kosovo’s status.”
The SAA’s text which Kostunica’s cabinet unanimously agreed to initial last November, stipulates that Kosovo is under United Nations’ administration as per UN Security Council Resolution 1244, passed at the end of the 1998-1999 conflict between Serb forces and Kosovo’s ethnic Albanian majority.
In the SAA’s article 135, it says the treaty does not deal with the status of Kosovo, Serbia’s former southern province, which declared independence on February 17.
The signing of the SAA, however, prompted a bitter row in Belgrade between pro-European and nationalist politicians who are about to face each other in early general elections due on Sunday.
The main topic dominating the election campaign is Serbia’s future links with the EU, with pro-Europeans pushing for closer ties with Brussels, arguing Serbia’s interests will be best defended within the bloc, while nationalists say Serbia should not join the EU unless it accepts Kosovo as a part of Serbia.
Related posts:
2 Comments »
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI
Leave a comment
Copyright © 1996-2008 Serbian Unity Congress
Entries and comments feeds.
Valid XHTML and CSS. ^Top^
The mouth piece of NATO imperialism will say anything before the election. Tadic’s party has signed Kosovo over to NATO. That’s it. All the rest of the verbal rubbish is just for propaganda purposes. Tadic has sold Kosovo for a promise.
The promise of EU membership sometime in the future.
It’s up to the Serbian voters to decide if that’s all Kosovo was worth.
Comment by Chris — May 6, 2008 #
Tadich is stupid, but not stupid enough. He knows what he signed, but does not know the damage to his own ambitions.
While it may appear that he signed away Kosovo, Europeans do not take it that way. They do want Kosovo to break away, but doubt that Tadich’s signature is enough to get them that.
Tadich did shoot himself in the foot by signing the document. He has ruined his election chances. Radicals will gain and, possibly, form a coaltion government with Kostunica and Dachich, without Tadich.
And that is exactly what the EU wants: the three most vilified parties in power. That will open the flood-gates of abuse, blackmail, sanctions, and demands on Serbia. In the ensuing mess Kosovo will slowly grow away from Serbia, while Belgrade scramble for power, and attempts to deal with EU extortions, consume nation’s energy.
Comment by Simon Saivil — May 6, 2008 #