April 13, 2007 on 3:28 am | In In Focus, Kosovo & Metohija, News in English, Washington |
Expressing the sense of the Senate that the United States should support independence for Kosovo. (Introduced in Senate)
SRES 135 IS
110th CONGRESS 1st Session
S. RES. 135Expressing the sense of the Senate that the United States should support independence for Kosovo.
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
March 29, 2007
Mr. LIEBERMAN (for himself, Mr. BIDEN, Mr. MCCAIN, and Mr. SMITH) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations
RESOLUTIONExpressing the sense of the Senate that the United States should support independence for Kosovo.
Whereas the United States has enduring national interests in the peace and security of southeastern Europe, and in the greater integration of the region into the Euro-Atlantic community of democratic, well-governed states;
Whereas, in March 1999, the United States, along with other members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO), commenced military action aimed at ending Slobodan Milosevic’s brutal campaign of ethnic cleansing against the people of Kosovo;
Whereas that military action resulted in the defeat of Serb forces and the creation of the United Nations Mission in Kosovo, an interim United Nations administration that governs Kosovo, and which ended, de facto, the sovereignty that was previously exercised by the Government of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia over Kosovo;
Whereas the men and women of the Armed Forces of the United States have served bravely in Kosovo since 1999, and their presence and participation in the NATO-led Kosovo Force has been indispensable in protecting the people of Kosovo and stabilizing the region;
Whereas United Nations administration was never intended nor understood as a permanent solution to the political status of Kosovo;
Whereas, in light of NATO’s military intervention in Kosovo and the United Nations trusteeship established in Kosovo pursuant to United Nations Security Council Resolution 1244 (1999), the international community has recognized the political circumstances in Kosovo as unique, and the settlement of Kosovo’s status therefore does not establish a precedent for the resolution of other conflicts;
Whereas continuing uncertainty about the status of Kosovo is unacceptable to the overwhelming majority of the inhabitants of Kosovo, inhibits economic and political development in Kosovo, and contributes to instability and radicalism in both Kosovo and Serbia;
Whereas, in 2005, the United Nations Secretary-General appointed the former President of Finland, Martti Ahtisaari, as United Nations Special Envoy for Kosovo to develop a comprehensive settlement proposal to resolve the political status of Kosovo;
Whereas, in March 2007, after 14 months of intensive diplomacy, Special Envoy Ahtisaari submitted to the Security Council a comprehensive settlement proposal that would result in supervised independence for Kosovo, with robust protections for the rights of minorities; and
Whereas Special Envoy Ahtisaari has explored every reasonable avenue for compromise in the course of his diplomacy and has stated that further negotiations would be counterproductive: Now, therefore, be it
Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that–
(1) the United States should support the independence of Kosovo in accordance with its currently constituted borders, a resolution that represents the only just, sustainable solution for an economically viable and politically stable Kosovo;
(2) the United States should, in consultation and cooperation with its allies, vigorously and promptly pursue a United Nations Security Council resolution that endorses the recommendations of United Nations Special Envoy for Kosovo Martti Ahtisaari;
(3) in the absence of timely action by the United Nations Security Council, the United States should be prepared to act in conjunction with like-minded democracies to confer diplomatic recognition on, and establish full diplomatic relations with, Kosovo as an independent state, much as the United States worked in cooperation with like-minded democracies to protect the people of Kosovo in 1999;
(4) the United States should oppose any delay in the resolution of the political status of Kosovo as counterproductive, potentially dangerous, and likely to make the achievement of a lasting settlement more difficult;
(5) the United States should work together with the European Union as a full partner in supporting the political and economic development of an independent Kosovo;
(6) the United States should support the integration of Kosovo into international and Euro-Atlantic institutions, including its timely admission to the Partnership for Peace program of the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO), with the ultimate goal of full membership in NATO;
(7) the United States should reaffirm its commitment to southeastern Europe, including the continuation of the military mission in Kosovo to deter and disrupt any efforts by any party to destabilize the region through violence;
(8) the Government of Kosovo should exercise responsible leadership under supervised independence and thereby accelerate the transition to full independence, taking particular care to reassure, protect, and ensure the full political and economic rights of Serb and other minority communities in Kosovo;
(9) the Government of Kosovo should make every reasonable effort to develop a cooperative relationship with the Government of Serbia, in recognition of its legitimate interests in the safety of the Serb population in Kosovo and in the protection and preservation of the patrimonial sites of the Serbian Orthodox Church in Kosovo; and
(10) the Government of Serbia should exercise responsible leadership and seize the opportunity and the imperative presented by the independence of Kosovo to end the dark chapter of the 1990s and focus its energies toward achieving a prosperous and peaceful future through regional cooperation and integration into Euro-Atlantic institutions, including NATO and the European Union, and toward the establishment of open, constructive relations with the government of Kosovo.
Related posts:
Entries and
I like to believe united states is right,but in yugoslavia i think we were wrong .
I have learned that united states and nato sabotaged yugoslavia . In kosovo we sent 1200 observers into check on what was happening . The international observers reported Serbia was acting honorabely and apprehending terrorists carfully . William walker the head of the international observers discarded many reports . I understand he discarded evrey report from the Italians . Thus careful apprehention of muslim terrorists was changed to Serbia was committing Genocide . With this new change united states was able to bring in the US airforce . United states wanted to attack the Serbs. So they made up this lie, they made up many more lies to go along with the Terrorists lies. Yes terrorists !The KLA never were freedom fighters anymore than Al Qaeda that fought with them are freedom fighters. These are the independance
loving Kosovo albanians That the United States Senate thinks are so deserving of getting Kosovo away from Serbia. The KLA is Al Qaeda and Al Qaeda is the KLA . Saudi arabia has helped out with money and 100s of new wahhabi mosques and teachers . The united States and Germany has helped out with military training, equipment and finally natzo’s airforce . Now the united states Senate has some real difficult work ahead
explain to us how saudi arabia wahhabi’s and Al Qaeda independance is going to bring real freedom to Kosovo . Somthing the Serb christians
will be happy with. All ready U.N. troops are afraid to confront Albanians who have acted in Kosovo exactly like the talaban in afganistan .
Comment by eric — April 13, 2007 #
Your nato led Kosovo force that you complimented so well for protecting the people of Kosovo . I shouldnt critisize I wasnt there . I dont know how hard it would have been to do a better job . I think you did a great job of promoting Al Qaeada as Saudi Arabia has built 100s of new mosques . I quess you could call that protecting if you want too. Now Iam going to tell you how you failed [1] explosives were sent to blow up a train in spain. 2 explosives were sent to london bus. and subway 3 evrey single jew was forced out of kosovo 4 Hundreds of antique christian church were desroyed 5 aproxmately 200, 000 christian Serbs were forced
out 6 romma and gypsyies have been persecuted
7 Kosovo now is the biggest supplier of heroine
for europe and the USA [ 8] most of the Serbs property has been burnt or destroyed so they cant come back 9 Kosovo is a much more dangerous place now than it was before you started protecting .
Comment by eric — April 13, 2007 #
When will the SUC, through its growing Caucus, submit a new resolution to the US Senate in response to the resolution submitted by Senators Lieberman, Biden, McCain and Smith supporting the Serbian Government position on Kosovo remaining within Serbia? Afterall, both sides of the issue must be presented in the same manner if taken to a vote in the Senate!
Comment by VB — April 14, 2007 #
Now is the time to contact our congressmen and express opposition to this Resolution, especially Article 1. What guarantees do Serbs and other minorities have that their rights will be respected under an indepdent Kosovo government? Should they trust Ceku, a war criminal wanted on several charges? Has state sovereignty lost all meaning in international law? Above all, how will the international community deal with a black hole in the Balkans? Will a “greater Albania” destabilize the fragile balance-of-power in the Balkans? If demographics set the rules for self-determination, then Serbs in Northern Kosovo, being the majority, should use its right of self-determination and seek independence from Kosovo proper. Why not then create 20 smaller states in the Balkans and destabilize the region some more?
Comment by Tena Andric — April 16, 2007 #
More buffoons…McCain, Biden, Lieberman.
McCain got hit one too many times in the head while in the Vietnam prison camp.
Comment by Dushko — April 27, 2007 #
I say we all got to Washington on the day they vote and have a nice Serbian protest. Peaceful. Short and sweet.
I think that Serbia should decide the fate of Texas when the Mexicans decide they wish to create a “LARGER MEXICO”.
Comment by Bankarka_FL — May 3, 2007 #